Marxism and Bitcoin have one thing in common, the idea that a radical change in the structure of society will happen in a bottom up decentralized fashion. Which of them, if either, will succeed in that goal?

Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, GETTR, Truth Social, Twitter 

Marx tells us the revolution will be decentralized. The Have-nots will tire of the great inequity of capitalism, and the few thousand Haves will suffer from the worldwide rebellion they encouraged through their greed.

Building central banks and controlling the money supply will force the onset of Communism. Centralization of wealth leads to decentralized rage; the overthrow is inevitable. Class will be the deciding factor, and people of all stripes and sexes among the most developed nations will rebel first. The dominos will fall until the least developed countries finally industrialize, experience the same inequities, and become communists themselves.

This is not what happened, of course. Lenin adapted Marxism to suit his needs, and with the help of Communist sympathizers in the United States, Communism was implemented top-down in underdeveloped Russia. The dominoes toppled forcefully. Country after country fell into or out of Communism thanks to top-down or outside interests throughout the Cold War, always at the expense of the citizenry, and rarely at their behest...

To read more visit Bitcoin Magazine.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!‘  

• BREAKING: USAID Promoting Radical Left Indoctrination, Funding Coups In Guatemala
• About The Picture Book Glorifying Japanese Bath House Culture In A Greenwich, CT, Elementary School Library